Learning goals:
+ Calculating row-level summaries within a data frame
+ Fitting simple linear regression models
+ Interpreting simple linear regression models
+ Visualizing simple linear regression models
Many college courses conclude by giving students the opportunity to evaluate the course and the instructor anonymously. However, the use of these student evaluations as an indicator of course quality and teaching effectiveness is often criticized because these measures may reflect the influence of non-teaching related characteristics, such as the physical appearance of the instructor.
The article titled, “Beauty in the classroom: instructors’ pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity” (Hamermesh and Parker, 2005) found that instructors who are viewed to be better looking receive higher instructional ratings.1 Daniel S. Hamermesh, Amy Parker, Beauty in the classroom: instructors pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity, Economics of Education Review, Volume 24, Issue 4, August 2005, Pages 369-376, ISSN 0272-7757, 10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.07.013. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775704001165.
The data were gathered from end of semester student evaluations for a large sample of professors from the University of Texas at Austin. In addition, six students rated the professors’ physical appearance. (This is a slightly modified version of the original data set that was released as part of the replication data for Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Gelman and Hill, 2007).) The result is a data frame where each row contains a different course and columns represent variables about the courses and professors.
The variables in the data and their descriptions are as follows:
Variable name | Description |
---|---|
score |
Average professor evaluation score: (1) very unsatisfactory - (5) excellent |
rank |
Rank of professor: teaching, tenure track, tenure |
ethnicity |
Ethnicity of professor: not minority, minority |
gender |
Gender of professor: female, male |
language |
Language of school where professor received education: english or non-english |
age |
Age of professor |
cls_perc_eval |
Percent of students in class who completed evaluation |
cls_did_eval |
Number of students in class who completed evaluation |
cls_students |
Total number of students in class |
cls_level |
Class level: lower, upper |
cls_profs |
Number of professors teaching sections in course in sample: single, multiple |
cls_credits |
Number of credits of class: one credit (lab, PE, etc.), multi credit |
bty_f1lower |
Beauty rating of professor from lower level female: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
bty_f1upper |
Beauty rating of professor from upper level female: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
bty_f2upper |
Beauty rating of professor from upper level female: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
bty_m1lower |
Beauty rating of professor from lower level male: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
bty_m1upper |
Beauty rating of professor from upper level male: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
bty_m2upper |
Beauty rating of professor from upper level male: (1) lowest - (10) highest |
In this week’s workshop you will analyze the data from this study in order to start exploring what goes into a positive professor evaluation.
You can find your team assignment for the rest of the semester here.
Go to the course GitHub organization and locate your Lab 06 repo, which should be named lab-07-model-course-evals-YOUR_TEAMNAME
. Grab the URL of the repo, and clone it in RStudio Cloud.
Your email address is the address tied to your GitHub account and your name should be first and last name.
Run the following (but update it for your name and email!) in the Console to configure Git:
In this lab you will first download the data, then upload it to the data/
folder in your RStudio Cloud project.
evals-mod.csv
.evals-mod.csv
file.Then, you can load the data as usual using the following.
We will use the following packages in this analysis:
bty_avg
that is the average attractiveness score of the six students for each professor (bty_f1lower
through bty_m2upper
). Add this new variable to the evals
data frame. Do this in one pipe, using the rowMeans()
function within a mutate()
.Let’s pause for a second to see what is happening in this piece of code. We are mutating the evals
data frame by adding a new variable, bty_avg
, that is calculated as the mean of the columns titled bty_f1lower
through bty_m2upper
in the evals
data frame (denoted with a .
here).
Visualize the distribution of score
. Is the distribution skewed? What does that tell you about how students rate courses? Is this what you expected to see? Why, or why not? Include any summary statistics and visualizations you use in your response.
Visualize and describe the relationship between score
and the new variable you created, bty_avg
.
Hint: See the help page for the function at http://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/reference/index.html.
geom_jitter()
? What does “jitter” mean? What was misleading about the initial scatterplot?Linear model is in the form \(\hat{y} = b_0 + b_1 x\).
Let’s see if the apparent trend in the plot is something more than natural variation. Fit a linear model called m_bty
to predict average professor evaluation score
by average beauty rating (bty_avg
). Based on the regression output, which you can obtain with tidy(m_bty)
, write the linear model.
Replot your visualization from Exercise 3, and add the regression line to this plot in orange color. Turn off the shading for the uncertainty of the line.
Interpret the slope of the linear model in context of the data.
Interpret the intercept of the linear model in context of the data. Comment on whether or not the intercept makes sense in this context.
Refer back to this week’s reading if you don’t remember what \(R^2\) means.
glance(m_bty)
.Fit a new linear model called m_gen
to predict average professor evaluation score
based on gender
of the professor. Based on the regression output, write the linear model and interpret the slope and intercept in context of the data.
What is the equation of the line corresponding to male professors? What is it for female professors?
Fit a new linear model called m_rank
to predict average professor evaluation score
based on rank
of the professor. Based on the regression output, write the linear model and interpret the slopes and intercept in context of the data.
Refer to the forcats package for changing the order of levels.
Create a new variable called rank_relevel
where "tenure track"
is the baseline level.
Fit a new linear model called m_rank_relevel
to predict average professor evaluation score
based on rank_relevel
of the professor. This is the new (releveled) variable you created in Exercise 13. Based on the regression output, write the linear model and interpret the slopes and intercept in context of the data. Also determine and interpret the \(R^2\) of the model.